Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Loden's Wheel is a framework used to analyze and understand the factors that influence decision-making. It consists of eight factors: organizational culture, personal values, power, resources, external constraints, expertise, readiness, and ethics. Applying this framework to the Sharanda Jones case of the 1990s, three factors that likely influenced the decision are:
Organizational Culture: The organizational culture within the criminal justice system, including the law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and judiciary, is a significant factor. The prevailing culture and norms within these institutions can influence decisions, including charging, prosecution, and sentencing. The culture may prioritize certain outcomes, such as high conviction rates or punitive measures, which can impact the decision-making process in cases like Sharanda Jones'.
Power: Power dynamics play a crucial role in decision-making. In the Sharanda Jones case, the power held by law enforcement, prosecutors, and judges could have influenced the decisions made throughout the legal process. The power differential between the prosecution and defense, as well as the influence of public perception and media attention, may have affected the outcomes of the case.
External Constraints: External constraints refer to factors outside the immediate control of the decision-makers. In the Sharanda Jones case, external factors such as public opinion, media coverage, and political pressures could have influenced the decision-making process. The broader societal context and public sentiment regarding drug offenses and sentencing policies at the time might have impacted the decisions made by the individuals involved in the case.
It's important to note that these factors are based on an analysis using Loden's Wheel framework and are subject to interpretation. The specific factors influencing the decision in the Sharanda Jones case may involve additional complexities and considerations beyond those mentioned here.