Question

which of the following is true of duress?group of answer choicesit is liable for fraud.a threat should involve physical harm for it to be actionable as duress.it is a threat issued to make another person sign a contract.intoxicating a person to sign a contract is considered duress.

Answer 1

Duress in contract law refers to a situation where a person is coerced into signing a contract under a threat, which can be of various forms and not limited to physical harm. It makes a contract voidable but is not the same as fraud.

Step-by-step explanation:

Duress in the context of contract law is a situation where a person signs a contract under a threat of harm, which renders the contract voidable. The threat does not necessarily need to involve physical harm; it can also be a threat of financial or other forms of harm. For instance, if someone threatens to illegally harm your business reputation unless you sign a contract, that can be considered duress.

It is not accurate to say that duress is liable for fraud, as fraud and duress are distinct legal concepts. Fraud involves deception and misrepresentation, whereas duress involves coercion and force. As for intoxicating a person to sign a contract, this would more accurately fall under the category of undue influence or incapacity rather than duress, although the effects are similar in rendering the agreement voidable.