Final answer:
The enforceability of Tom's promise to pay Jack for not marrying for 20 years depends on contract law and public policy. The contract must have offer, acceptance, and consideration, but may not be enforceable if it excessively restrains personal freedom or is against public policy.
This correct answer is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whether Tom's promise to pay his son Jack $100,000 if he refrains from marrying for 20 years would be enforceable depends on the legal jurisdiction and the specifics of contract law within that jurisdiction.
Generally, for a contract to be enforceable, there needs to be an offer, acceptance, and consideration on both sides. In this scenario, the offer is the $100,000, the acceptance would be Jack agreeing to the terms, and the consideration would be Jack's agreement to refrain from an action he is legally entitled to pursue, which is marrying.
However, such a condition might be seen as against public policy because marriage is a fundamental right and personal decision, potentially making the contract unenforceable.
Further, the details of the arrangement, such as how it is documented and the legal capacity of both parties to enter into a contract, are also essential factors.
Some jurisdictions might not enforce such a contract if it is deemed to excessively restrain personal freedom. Therefore, without specific legal context, the statement could be false, but it should be examined by a legal professional within the relevant jurisdiction to determine its enforceability.
This correct answer is false.