Final Answer:
The correct option to support the argument that prehistoric and ancient art have differences is Option 4: Ancient architectural structures were built on a much grander scale than the structures of prehistoric societies. Thus the correct option is 4.
Step-by-step explanation:
Ancient and prehistoric art indeed exhibit several distinctions, and one significant difference lies in the scale of architectural structures. Prehistoric societies, characterized by a lack of written records, primarily produced smaller-scale structures and cave paintings. In contrast, ancient civilizations, marked by advanced cultures and written languages, constructed monumental architectural wonders such as the pyramids in Egypt or the Parthenon in Greece.
The scale of architectural structures is indicative of the societal advancements and technological capabilities of ancient civilizations, showcasing their ability to undertake large-scale construction projects. Prehistoric art, lacking the monumental architecture seen in ancient cultures, often focused on smaller-scale, intricate cave paintings and artifacts.
Understanding these differences enhances our appreciation for the cultural and technological evolution between prehistoric and ancient societies, highlighting the unique characteristics of each era's artistic expressions. Therefore, Option 4 provides a strong point of distinction between prehistoric and ancient art, supporting the argument against Nathaniel's claim of their near identical nature.