Question

How could you imagine if Forensic Photography isn't invented up to this day? Would it be easy for a police job using the traditional way of solving crimes, or much more advantageous when using a camera? Support your answer. A. It would be easier with traditional methods. B. It would be more advantageous with forensic photography. C. Both methods would have their advantages. D. None of the above.

Answer 1

I could imagine that if Forensic Photography isn't invented up to this day ,"It would be more advantageous with forensic photography". Option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Forensic photography revolutionized crime scene investigations by providing accurate and detailed visual documentation. Prior to its invention, reliance on traditional methods like sketches, notes, and verbal descriptions often led to inaccuracies, missing details, and subjective interpretations. Forensic photography not only captures precise details but also preserves the scene exactly as it was when discovered, allowing for meticulous analysis, reexamination, and presentation of evidence in court.

The absence of forensic photography would severely hinder investigations, potentially leading to increased inaccuracies, difficulties in establishing timelines, and challenges in recreating crime scenes. The reliance on subjective human memory and interpretations would leave ample room for errors and inconsistencies, impacting the pursuit of justice. The introduction of forensic photography significantly streamlined investigations, enabling investigators to gather, analyze, and present evidence more effectively.

Correct answer: B. It would be more advantageous with forensic photography.