Question

What was Scott’s argument for freedom in the context of the Dred Scott v. Sandford case? a. Slavery was illegal in the North. b. His slaveholder had granted him freedom by taking him North. c. When Scott lived on free soil, he became free. d. The Declaration of Independence acknowledged the rights of enslaved individuals and their descendants.

Answer 1

Scott's argument for freedom in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was that when he lived on free soil, he became free.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Scott's argument for freedom was that when he lived on free soil, he became free. Scott had been taken to free territories such as Illinois and Wisconsin, where slavery was prohibited. He argued that his time spent in these free areas should have made him a free man.

Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford