222k views
2 votes
On what grounds did the abolitionists argue for Dred Scott's freedom? a) Economic equality b) Violation of states' rights c) Violation of federal laws d) Violation of human rights

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The abolitionists argued for Dred Scott's freedom on the grounds of violation of human rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

The abolitionists argued for Dred Scott's freedom primarily on the grounds of violation of human rights. They believed that as a human being, Dred Scott should not be held in bondage and that all individuals have the right to freedom and equality. The Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford denied Scott his freedom and perpetuated the unjust system of slavery.

Learn more about Dred Scott's freedom

User Adriane
by
7.6k points