Final answer:
John Brown differed from other abolitionists such as William Lloyd Garrison by his willingness to take violent action, including armed insurrection, to end slavery, while Garrison and other contemporaries largely advocated through non-violent means and the press.
Step-by-step explanation:
How John Brown Differed From Other Abolitionists
John Brown was a radical abolitionist who notably differed from other abolitionists, like William Lloyd Garrison, in his willingness to take violent action to end slavery. While other abolitionists like Garrison used a platform of moral suasion with the hope of convincing slaveholders to voluntarily release their slaves, Brown resorted to violence, as seen in his 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry. His militant approach to ending slavery contrasted sharply with the pacifist stances of many of his contemporaries who relied on non-violent advocacy and journalism, such as Garrison's work with his abolitionist newspaper 'The Liberator'.
Garrison and others in the abolitionist movement mainly used press and peaceful means to promote their cause, emphasizing the moral and religious aspects of abolition. They believed in immediate emancipation and pushed to bring the issue into the public consciousness through advocacy in the North. In contrast, Brown felt that immediate action was necessary and took up arms, believing that a violent overthrow of the institution of slavery was essential.