Final answer:
Todd admitted to the plagiarism in the group project, but academic integrity responsibilities may involve all group members depending on the institution's policies. It highlights the importance of each member ensuring the originality of the submitted work and upholding academic honesty principles.
Step-by-step explanation:
When it comes to a case where part of a group project is plagiarized, identifying who is responsible for an academic integrity violation is essential. Although Todd admitted to writing the plagiarized portions, the concept of group responsibility also comes into play. According to many university codes, all members of the group could potentially be held accountable for the submission, as every member is expected to ensure that the entire project complies with the standards of academic honesty. However, specifics can vary based on the academic integrity policy of the institution.
It is important for all students to understand the consequences of plagiarism and to engage in genuine learning. The entire group should have had protocols to review each other's work for originality and to use tools available to check for possible instances of plagiarism. This situation illustrates the importance of each team member understanding and upholding the prinicples of academic integrity not just for academic success, but for maintaining trust and equity within the academic community.
Ultimately, the responsibility for the violation might primarily rest with Todd, but depending on the circumstances and university policies, Neil and Chris may also share some level of responsibility for the final submission that included plagiarized content.