Question

magine that the true level of human rights violations in coun- try x is 5 on a scale of 0 to 10. say there are four people who code the level of human rights violations in country x using two dierent measures, a and b. measure a yields values of 3, 4, 6, and 7. measure b yields values of 6, 5, 7, and 6. is measure a or measure b a more valid measure of human rights violations? why

Answer 1

Measure B, with values of 6, 5, 7, and 6, is more valid than Measure A for assessing human rights violations in country X, considering it provides values more consistently close to the true value of 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

The true level of human rights violations in country X is stated to be 5 on a scale from 0 to 10. When comparing the two measures, A and B, for their validity in representing the true level of human rights violations, Measure B appears to be more accurate. Measure A yields values of 3, 4, 6, and 7, while Measure B yields values of 6, 5, 7, and 6. Considering that Measure B’s values are consistently closer to the true value of 5, it is a more valid measure. It has less variance from the true score and a higher degree of consistency, which is one of the indicators of a valid measure.

Measurement validity is crucial when assessing something as complex and important as human rights violations. To effectively monitor such situations, reliable data that closely represents the actual conditions is necessary. Assessments of human rights can be gleaned from sources like Human Rights Watch, Our World in Data, and other indexes, but establishing a valid measure is imperative for accurate representation and subsequent actions or policy implementations.