14.2k views
2 votes
How does the artist's interpretation most clearly change the significance of

the story?
A. The image suggests that the crew's fortunes are about to improve.
B. The image suggests that the crew's argument is relatively petty.
C. The image suggests that the squabble will be resolved in time.
D. The image suggests that the action takes place on a fishing boat.

1 Answer

3 votes

The artist's interpretation can significantly impact the significance of the story as the image suggests that the crew's argument is relatively pitty.

Hence the correct option is B.

This artistic choice downplays the gravity of their situation and shifts the focus to the interpersonal dynamics of the crew. The jovial atmosphere created by the artist belies the underlying danger and serious consequences faced by the characters in the story.

Furthermore, the artist's depiction of the carefree interaction between the sailors and their wide-eyed expressions dismisses any sense of imminent threat, thereby reinforcing that the squabble among them is of little significance. This contrast between the visual interpretation and the textual narrative opens a dialogue on the discrepancies between appearance and reality, as well as the power of artistic license in telling a story.

FULL QUESTION-

The three-man crew of the Guppy, all of them scowling, sat around a table in the galley while the room tilted back and forth. The captain reminded the crew that their pay was one percent of the profits from the fish they caught, which wasn't much encouragement since they hadn't caught any fish.

How does the artist's interpretation most clearly change the significance of the story?

A. The image suggests that the crew's fortunes are about to improve.

B. The image suggests that the crew's argument is relatively petty.

C. The image suggests that the squabble will be resolved in time.

D. The image suggests that the action takes place on a fishing boat.

User Nik Todorov
by
7.1k points