Question

which description about the koto and its history is not true? multiple choice koto music in the edo period was primarily ceremonial in character and heard mostly in temples. the importance of the koto in traditional japanese music is comparable to that of the piano in western music. the koto is not limited solely to open string pitches. the koto was originally imported from china sometime between 650 and 750.

Answer 1

The incorrect statement is that koto music in the Edo period was primarily ceremonial and confined to temples. Edo period arts reflected rich cultural achievements beyond ceremonial use, including koto music which was significant in entertainment much like the piano in Western music.

Step-by-step explanation:

The description about the koto and its history that is not true is that koto music in the Edo period was primarily ceremonial in character and heard mostly in temples. While it is true that the koto was originally imported from China sometime between 650 and 750, and it isn't limited solely to open string pitches, its use was not confined solely to ceremonial or temple settings. Instead, during the Edo period, which lasted from 1603 to 1868, there was an explosion of cultural and artistic expression, including music. The koto music, influenced by the sophistication of urban culture, became an essential part of the entertainment landscape, akin to the importance of the piano in Western music. The arts and entertainment, including kabuki theater and woodblock prints in the Ukiyo-e style, reflected a society rich in cultural achievements that went beyond just the ceremonial.