139k views
0 votes
Let X₁ ,X₂ ,…, Xₙ constitute a random sample from a U[0,θ] distribution. (a) Calculate the MSE when the sample mean is used to estimate θ. (b) Suppose there is another estimator, ϕ(x)=2 xˉ. Find the MSE of this estimation (c) Which of these two estimators would you choose to estimate θ and why?

User Angelotti
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final Answer:

(a) The mean squared error (MSE) when using the sample mean
(\(\overline{X}\)) to estimate
\(\theta\) is \((\theta^2)/(12n)\).

(b) The MSE for the estimator
\(\phi(x) = 2\overline{X}\) is \((\theta^2)/(3n)\).

(c) The estimator
\(\phi(x) = 2\overline{X}\) is preferred as it has a smaller MSE, providing a more efficient estimate of
\(\theta\).

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) To calculate the MSE for the sample mean
(\(\overline{X}\)), we use the formula:


\[MSE(\overline{X}) = E\left[(\overline{X} - \theta)^2\right]\]

Given that
\(\overline{X}\) follows a U[0, \(\theta\)] distribution, the variance of
\(\overline{X}\) is
\((\theta^2)/(12n)\). Therefore, the MSE is
\((\theta^2)/(12n)\).

(b) For the estimator
\(\phi(x) = 2\overline{X}\), we calculate its MSE:


\[MSE(\phi) = E\left[(2\overline{X} - \theta)^2\right]\]

Since the variance of
\(2\overline{X}\) is \((\theta^2)/(3n)\), the MSE is \((\theta^2)/(3n)\).

(c) Comparing the MSE values, we find that the MSE for
\(\phi(x) = 2\overline{X}\) is smaller than that for
\(\overline{X}\). A smaller MSE indicates a more efficient estimator. Therefore,
\(\phi(x) = 2\overline{X}\) is preferred for estimating
\(\theta\) due to its lower MSE, implying better precision and accuracy in estimation.

User Boone
by
7.1k points