Final Answer:
The statement and reason that best complete the proof are Option C:"2. 2m₂ + m₃ = 180°" and Reason: "Linear pair theorem."
Step-by-step explanation:
The given proof involves demonstrating the relationship between angles formed by the intersection of Line
and Line
. Let
and
represent the measures of the angles formed. The linear pair theorem states that supplementary angles add up to \(180°\). Therefore, the calculation for Option C is as follows:
![\[2m_2 + m_3 = 2 * \text{measure of angle } m_2 + \text{measure of angle } m_3\]](https://img.qammunity.org/2024/formulas/mathematics/high-school/hzuy0j08sewdq7epcs9tdmu973ctpoocr3.png)
This expression corresponds to the sum of the measures of angles formed by Line
and Line
. According to the linear pair theorem, when these angles are supplementary, their sum equals
. Thus, Option C accurately represents the relationship between the angle measures and is the appropriate choice for completing the proof.
Option A, suggesting
based on the definition of supplementary angles, is not applicable to this context. The given statements involve angles
and
, not
and
. Options B and D do not directly address the measures of the angles involved in the proof.
By selecting Option C and citing the linear pair theorem as the reason, the proof logically establishes the supplementary relationship between the angles formed by the intersection of Line
and Line

So correcct option is Option C