Final answer:
A Product Owner who used to be a project manager in the past is using burn-up charts instead of burn-down charts. There's nothing wrong with it. The correct option is a.
Step-by-step explanation:
The choice between burn-up charts and burn-down charts is not necessarily about traditional or agile methods; rather, it depends on the specific needs and preferences of the team and the project. Both types of charts provide valuable insights into project progress but emphasize different aspects.
Here's a brief overview:
Burn-down Charts: Typically associated with Agile methodologies.
Show the remaining work (backlog) over time.
The line on the chart "burns down" to zero, representing the completion of all planned work.
Provides a clear visual representation of work completed versus remaining work.
Burn-up Charts: Can be used in both traditional and Agile contexts.
Show the cumulative work completed over time.
The line on the chart "burns up" to show the total work completed, including scope changes or additions.
Provides insights into the overall progress and the impact of changes in scope.
The Product Owner's choice to use burn-up charts might be based on a preference for emphasizing the overall progress of the project, including changes in scope, which can be valuable in certain contexts. Burn-up charts can also be useful for stakeholders who are interested in understanding the total value delivered, even if the scope has evolved.
Therefore, it's not necessarily unacceptable for a Product Owner with a project management background to use burn-up charts. The key is to use the chart that best serves the needs of the team and stakeholders and provides clear insights into project progress.
So, the correct answer would be: a. There's nothing wrong with it.