Final answer:
No,
is not a difference of squares.In the case of
, there's no subtraction between squared terms, which means it doesn't meet the criteria for a difference of squares.
Explanation:
The expression
cannot be represented in the form of
where
are both squared terms. In a difference of squares, the expression would have the format
, showcasing the subtraction of two perfect square terms.
However, in this case, the expression consists of \(b^{2}\) (a perfect square) and
(also a perfect square) but without the subtraction required for a difference of squares. Thus, it doesn't conform to the specific format of a difference of squares.
A difference of squares pattern typically involves the subtraction of two squared terms, resulting in a binomial expression that factors into the product of conjugate binomials. For instance, an expression like \
fits the difference of squares pattern, as it can be factored into
, showcasing the subtraction of squared terms.
In the case of
, there's no subtraction between squared terms, which means it doesn't meet the criteria for a difference of squares.