Final Answer:
False: The confidence interval alone doesn't provide enough information to reject or not reject the null hypothesis.
True: One factor at a time design overlooks interactions between factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the first question, a confidence interval is provided for the population mean (μ) along with the null hypothesis (H₀: μ = 10) and an alternative hypothesis (H₁ ≠ 10). However, without knowing the actual sample mean or standard deviation, we cannot make a definitive decision regarding the null hypothesis at the 0.05 significance level. The decision would typically involve comparing the hypothesized value with the confidence interval bounds.
The second question discusses the limitation of a one-factor-at-a-time design, which focuses on individual factors without considering their interactions. This approach may overlook potential combined effects, leading to an incomplete understanding of the factors' impact.
Regarding the third question, the population in the survey is all students, as the Theater Club intends to make an inference about the entire student population based on the sampled 100 students. However, the conclusion drawn by the club is an overgeneralization, as preferences within the sampled 100 students cannot be assumed to represent the entire population.
Finally, the fourth question clarifies the distinction between the sample mean (ȳ) and the sample variance (S²) as point estimators for the population mean (μ) and population variance (σ²), respectively. It notes that the sample standard deviation (S) is the appropriate point estimator for the population standard deviation (σ).