Final answer:
The discussed study is an experiment to assess the incidence of gastrointestinal ulcers among arthritis patients using Celebrex versus other NSAIDs. It was double-blinded to prevent bias. Two caveats of the study include potential conflict of interest and a relatively short study duration.
Step-by-step explanation:
The study in question is an experiment because it involves the manipulation of variables (type of medication given to patients) and the control of other variables to determine the effect on a specific outcome (the incidence of gastrointestinal ulcers). Given that there were exactly 8000 arthritis patients in the study and that the distribution of patients to different drug groups was random, the simulation of which patients received Celebrex using a calculator with a predetermined seed value would be a mechanism to assign treatment groups in a pseudo-random fashion.
2 As the study reported that only 6% of the Celebrex subjects reported ulcers, with 4000 patients in the Celebrex group, 6% would equate to 240 patients reporting ulcers. A double-blinded study is one in which neither the participants nor the researchers know who is receiving a particular treatment, a method used to prevent bias in research results.
The caveats mentioned for this study include potential bias due to the study being funded by the manufacturer of Celebrex and the limitation of the study's duration relative to the long-term use of the drug by arthritis patients.