Answer:
Nicholas Carr argues in "IT doesn't Matter" that information technology's strategic value decreases as it becomes widespread and commoditized. He suggests that technology's unique competitive advantage is lessening due to its universal accessibility. Despite counter-arguments emphasizing human innovation, Carr contends that we cannot dismiss the existing challenges IT adoption brings.
Step-by-step explanation:
In "IT doesn't Matter," Nicholas Carr argues that as information technology becomes more ubiquitous and commoditized, it loses its strategic value. Carr posits that IT, much like infrastructure technologies such as railroads and electricity before it, has begun to lose its ability to provide competitive advantage as it becomes accessible to all. This is a significant shift from the earlier periods when innovative IT implementations could yield significant business advantages.
The crux of Carr's argument is twofold: that the proprietariness of IT is diminishing, and that as a result, the strategic significance of IT investments is also diminishing.
Counter-arguments to Carr's perspective often cite the ceaseless innovation and human ingenuity in the field of technology.
They highlight the unpredictability of the future and the potential
boundaries of innovation that we have yet to push.
However, Carr challenges this optimistic viewpoint by asking whether such progressive innovation can dismiss the difficulties and planetary boundaries we currently face.
Ultimately, while Carr acknowledges the power of human imagination and innovation, he maintains that we cannot ignore the challenges presented by the mass adoption and standardization of IT.