3.8k views
2 votes
after reviewing the mit moral machine experiment paper and participating in the online moral machine experiment moral machinelinks to an external site., engage in a reflective discussion on the following topics (mo2): are the patterns identified in the paper consistent with your own survey response? should a human driver allow the ai behind the self-driving vehicle to make trolley problems like ethical decisions? why or why not and in what form? should ai behind those currently operating our daily business be responsible for their action? please use the example to explain your argument if ai could achieve consciousness (watch the video), should it be granted legal status and bear the responsibility?

User Opedge
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

6 votes

The questions relate to the ethical implications of AI, including human responsibility, the role of AI in decision-making, and the legal status of conscious AI.

The questions posed in the reflection are all related to the ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) and the responsibility humans have towards the actions of AI. Here are the answers to each question:

  1. The patterns identified in the paper may or may not be consistent with the student's own survey response. It would depend on the specific responses given by the student and the patterns identified in the paper. Comparing the two would require a specific analysis of both the student's response and the patterns identified in the paper.
  2. Whether a human driver should allow AI behind a self-driving vehicle to make ethical decisions like trolley problems depends on various factors. On one hand, AI could potentially make more rational and calculated decisions in certain situations. On the other hand, allowing AI to make such decisions raises ethical concerns regarding the value of human life and the potential for unintended consequences. Ultimately, this is a complex topic that requires careful consideration and the development of comprehensive ethical frameworks.
  3. The AI behind currently operating daily business should be responsible for their actions to a certain extent. However, the ultimate responsibility lies with the humans who design and program the AI systems. Humans should ensure that AI is built with ethical considerations in mind and that there are proper checks and balances in place to prevent any harmful actions. An example could be an AI-powered virtual assistant that provides incorrect medical advice. In such a case, the AI may be partially responsible for providing the incorrect advice, but the human developers and operators of the AI system would bear the ultimate responsibility.
  4. If AI could achieve consciousness, granting it legal status and assigning it responsibilities would be a highly debated topic. Some argue that conscious AI should be granted legal status and rights similar to humans, while others believe that AI should be treated as property or tools. This would require a deep exploration of the nature of consciousness and the moral and legal implications of granting legal status to AI.

Complete Question:

After reviewing the MIT Moral Machine experiment paper and participating in the online Moral Machine experiment Moral Machine Links to an external site., engage in a reflective discussion on the following topics:

1.Are the patterns identified in the paper consistent with your own survey response?

2.Should a human driver allow the AI behind the self-driving vehicle to make trolley problems like ethical decisions? Why or why not and in what form?

3.Should AI behind those currently operating our daily business be responsible for their action? Please use the example to explain your argument

4.If AI could achieve consciousness (Watch the video), should it be granted legal status and bear the responsibility?

User Istiak Morsalin
by
7.9k points