Final answer:
When a paragraph starts with an idea contrary to the topic sentence, which is delayed, it is said to be 'inductive'. This requires that the preliminary sentences logically lead to the topic sentence, and proper organization and transitional elements are necessary to prevent confusion.
Step-by-step explanation:
When the topic sentence is delayed such that a paragraph begins with a contrary idea of the topic sentence, the paragraph could be said to be inductive. This is an organization method where arguments are presented in a manner opposing the final claim or topic, leading to a delay in the revelation of the topic sentence. For example, the paragraph might begin by examining a viewpoint contrary to the actual topic, then gradually present the argument or evidence leading up to and supporting the final claim, which is eventually revealed in the topic sentence.
This structure is used to draw the reader in and generate interest or suspense, but it can be confusing if not properly organized and if transitions are missing or inappropriate. It is important to ensure that the sentences before the delayed topic sentence are cohesive and logically lead the reader to the conclusion presented in the topic sentence. Otherwise, the paragraph might be poorly organized or its ideas might seem unrelated to the thesis.
Learn more about Inductive Paragraphs