Final answer:
Culture fair tests of intelligence can both possess and lack predictive validity depending on the context. They were designed to avoid cultural bias and measure intelligence accurately regardless of cultural background. However, their ability to predict future performance is a topic of ongoing debate.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that "culture fair" tests of intelligence lack predictive validity can be both true and false, depending on the context. "Culture fair" tests of intelligence were designed to circumvent cultural bias and provide an accurate measurement of a person's intelligence regardless of their cultural background. However, the predictive validity of these tests—how well the tests predicts future performance or behavior—is a topic of ongoing debate.
Many researchers assert that while these tests are more equitable, they may not provide a complete picture of a person's abilities, especially when using the tests to predict success in certain fields that are deeply embedded in a specific culture. For example, in roles that require a deep understanding of a specific cultural context, these tests might lack predictive validity.
However, in a more general context, culture fair tests aim to measure cognitive skills and general problem-solving abilities, which are indeed related to many forms of success. So, in these contexts, they may indeed possess predictive validity.
Learn more about Culture Fair Tests and Predictive Validity