Final answer:
Fasting is a common practice in many religions, however, the wellbeing and physical health of the person fasting should always take precedence. Particularly those with underlying health issues, such as diabetes, or pregnant women may be advised not to fast. Thus, scenario 'd' is a valid modern situation where fasting might be considered inappropriate.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mark 2:18-20 does suggest that there are times when fasting would be inappropriate, and these conditions can be applied to modern scenarios. The condition when 'providing for physical health' stands out, for instance, if a person is diabetic, pregnant, or battling a sickness that requires regular food intake. In these situations, often, it's encouraged to prioritize health over the religious practice of fasting.
Fasting is seen in various religions like the Latin Catholic Church and Islam, where one fasts from age of 18 to 59 and during the month of Ramadan respectively. However, irrespective of these religious practices, it is crucial for one to consider their health status and consult with a healthcare professional before deciding to fast.
Different cultures and religions indeed have different norms and rules regarding fasting. While fasting aims to mirror a spirit of sacrifice or commitment for a cause, it must not compromise the individual's health and well-being. Therefore, the answer is d) When providing for physical health, as this is a modern situation where a person should not participate in a fast. Healthcare professionals often advise against fasting for those who have certain medical conditions or for those who are in a state of frail health.
Learn more about Fasting