Final answer:
Companies and individuals justify manufacturing and purchasing goods involving child labor through various justifications such as claiming no control, guaranteeing no child labor, relying on local country monitoring, and suggesting better conditions for workers.
Step-by-step explanation:
Manufacturing and purchasing goods that involve child labor to produce can be justified by some companies and individuals using a few justifications:
- They indicate that they have no control over it. This implies that they claim they are not directly responsible for the use of child labor in the manufacturing process.
- They guarantee that no child labor is used. This argument suggests that the companies or individuals ensure that their supply chain is free from child labor.
- They rely on local countries to monitor working conditions. This justification suggests that the responsibility of monitoring and regulating working conditions, including child labor, falls on the government and authorities of the countries where the production takes place.
- They indicate that people working in those factories are better off than others who don't have those jobs. This argument suggests that, despite the ethical concerns of child labor, individuals working in such factories may have better economic opportunities compared to other available options in their communities or regions.
Learn more about Ethics of manufacturing & purchasing goods involving child labor