Question

Statements

Some scientists have
fabricated experimental
results.
The number of people who are
studied as part of an
experiment can influence the
chance of replication.
Non-replication shows that
the original study results were
wrong.
Psychologists should only
pursue experiments that have
a high chance of replication.
There are strong incentives
offered to scientists to
replicate their own studies.
Agree or
Disagree?
Were you
right?
Why/why not?

Answer 1

I agree that psychologists should prioritize experiments with a high chance of replication.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The statement to agree or disagree with is:

'Psychologists should only pursue experiments that have a high chance of replication.'

I agree with the statement. Replication is an important aspect of scientific research as it provides evidence of the validity and reliability of an experiment's results.

When the number of people studied as part of an experiment is small, it increases the chance of random errors and may limit the generalizability of the findings. On the other hand, conducting experiments on a larger sample size reduces these errors and increases the likelihood of the same results being obtained in subsequent replications.

Psychologists should prioritize experiments with a high chance of replication as this ensures the credibility of their research and facilitates the advancement of scientific knowledge.'

Learn more about Science Experiments