4.0k views
1 vote
Chief Justice John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the Cherokee were a sovereign nation.

Despite this ruling
(1 point)
O The Cherokee could not hold political offices in Georgia.
O The Indian Removal Act could not be enforced.
O The Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia.
O The Indian Removal Act was still repealed.

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Despite the ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, the Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia.


Step-by-step explanation:

Chief Justice John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the Cherokee were a sovereign nation. However, despite this ruling, the Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia. They faced numerous obstacles and discriminatory laws that limited their rights, such as not being able to hold political offices in Georgia.

This ruling did not prevent the enforcement of the Indian Removal Act, which eventually led to the forced removal of the Cherokee and other Native American tribes from their ancestral lands in the Southeastern United States.

Therefore, the correct answer is: The Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia.


Learn more about Worcester v. Georgia and the enforcement of the Indian Removal Act

User Mctuna
by
6.6k points