Question

In the landmark Supreme Court case the Pentagon Papers, the court ruled that the government

had not proven that actual malice had been used by the New York Times
had violated the civil liberties of Daniel Ellsberg
Ohad engaged in illegal activities in pursuing war in Vietnam
Ohad met the extraordinary burden of proof needed for prior restraint
Ohad not met the extraordinary burden of proof needed for prior restraint

Answer 1

The Supreme Court ruled that the government had not proven actual malice and the case raised issues of freedom of the press and prior restraint.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the landmark Supreme Court case the Pentagon Papers, the court ruled that the government had not proven that actual malice had been used by the New York Times. The case involved leaked government documents about the Vietnam War and raised issues of government secrecy and the freedom of the press. The court's ruling focused on whether the publication of the documents constituted prior restraint, which is when the government tries to prevent the publication of information.

Learn more about Pentagon Papers