Answer:
People debated adopting the proposed constitution for several reasons. Here are three details from the text that explain why:
1. Some people were concerned about the concentration of power. The text mentions that opponents of the constitution feared that the new government would become too centralized, which could potentially lead to an abuse of power. They argued that the proposed constitution did not provide enough checks and balances to prevent tyranny.
2. There were disagreements about the representation of states. The text states that smaller states were worried about being overshadowed by larger states under the proposed constitution. They believed that their voices and interests would not be adequately represented in the new government, leading to an imbalance of power between states.
3. The absence of a Bill of Rights was a point of contention. According to the text, some critics argued that the proposed constitution did not include a Bill of Rights, which would protect individual liberties and limit the government's authority. They believed that without explicit protections for citizens, their rights could be infringed upon by the new government.
In summary, the debates surrounding the adoption of the proposed constitution centered around concerns about the concentration of power, disagreements about state representation, and the absence of a Bill of Rights. These factors led to discussions and disagreements among the people as they considered whether to adopt the new constitution.
Step-by-step explanation:
People debated adopting the proposed constitution for several reasons. Here are three details from the text that explain why:
1. Some people were concerned about the concentration of power. The text mentions that opponents of the constitution feared that the new government would become too centralized, which could potentially lead to an abuse of power. They argued that the proposed constitution did not provide enough checks and balances to prevent tyranny.
2. There were disagreements about the representation of states. The text states that smaller states were worried about being overshadowed by larger states under the proposed constitution. They believed that their voices and interests would not be adequately represented in the new government, leading to an imbalance of power between states.
3. The absence of a Bill of Rights was a point of contention. According to the text, some critics argued that the proposed constitution did not include a Bill of Rights, which would protect individual liberties and limit the government's authority. They believed that without explicit protections for citizens, their rights could be infringed upon by the new government.
In summary, the debates surrounding the adoption of the proposed constitution centered around concerns about the concentration of power, disagreements about state representation, and the absence of a Bill of Rights. These factors led to discussions and disagreements among the people as they considered whether to adopt the new constitution.