119k views
3 votes
Which of the following statements best summarizes the Anti-Federalist position on the necessity of

adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution?
O It would protect all citizens from discrimination at the hands of state governments.
O It would resolve disputes between the small and large states.
O It would grant absolute rights to all people who lived in the United States.
O It would protect citizens from federal government infringement of their rights.
O It would establish principles of civil liberties and rights that would lead to the end of slavery.

User Hatter
by
6.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The Anti-Federalists believed that adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution would protect citizens from federal government infringement of their rights.


Step-by-step explanation:

The Anti-Federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the Constitution without the addition of a Bill of Rights. Their main concern was protecting the rights of individuals from potential infringement by the federal government. Therefore, the best summary of the Anti-Federalist position is that adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution would protect citizens from federal government infringement of their rights.


Learn more about Anti-Federalist position on the necessity of adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution

User Terman
by
7.2k points