119k views
3 votes
Which of the following statements best summarizes the Anti-Federalist position on the necessity of

adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution?
O It would protect all citizens from discrimination at the hands of state governments.
O It would resolve disputes between the small and large states.
O It would grant absolute rights to all people who lived in the United States.
O It would protect citizens from federal government infringement of their rights.
O It would establish principles of civil liberties and rights that would lead to the end of slavery.

User Hatter
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The Anti-Federalists believed that adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution would protect citizens from federal government infringement of their rights.


Step-by-step explanation:

The Anti-Federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the Constitution without the addition of a Bill of Rights. Their main concern was protecting the rights of individuals from potential infringement by the federal government. Therefore, the best summary of the Anti-Federalist position is that adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution would protect citizens from federal government infringement of their rights.


Learn more about Anti-Federalist position on the necessity of adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution

User Terman
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.