29.9k views
1 vote
Writing Practice

In the box, type a well-organized
response that fully answers each
part of the following prompt.
Mahatma Gandhi is credited with
saying, `An eye for an eye makes the
whole world blind."
Do you agree or disagree with an eye
for an eye" retribution for wrongdoing?
Why or why not? Use your personal
observations, experience, and
knowledge to support your essay.

User Juliette
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

I disagree with the idea of 'an eye for an eye' retribution for wrongdoing as it perpetuates a cycle of violence and does not lead to true justice. Instead, it is important to focus on addressing root causes and promoting healing and understanding.


Step-by-step explanation:

In this prompt, the subject being discussed is the concept of retribution for wrongdoing. It is asking whether the idea of 'an eye for an eye' is an effective form of punishment or not. To answer this, you need to consider your own observations, experiences, and knowledge.

Personally, I disagree with the idea of 'an eye for an eye.' Although it may feel satisfying in the moment to seek revenge, it often perpetuates a cycle of violence and does not lead to true justice. For example, if someone harms you and you harm them in return, it may provoke further retaliation from them or others, creating a continuous cycle of harm.

Furthermore, it is important to consider the principles of fairness and empathy. Retribution focuses on punishment rather than rehabilitation or resolution. Instead of blindly seeking revenge, it is more productive to find ways to address the root causes of wrongdoing and promote healing and understanding.


Learn more about Retribution and justice

User Smartsanja
by
7.5k points