Question

Which of the following terms explains why WWII was NOT a war of attrition, or a

stalemate, as WWI was?
a) trench warfare
Ob) the bombing of civilians
Oc) influenza
d) blitkrieg

Answer 1

The term that explains why WWII was NOT a war of attrition or a stalemate like WWI is blitzkrieg.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct term that explains why WWII was NOT a war of attrition or a stalemate like WWI is blitzkrieg. Blitzkrieg, meaning 'lightning war' in German, was a military tactic used by the Germans in WWII that involved a rapid, overwhelming attack to quickly defeat the enemy. Unlike in WWI, where trench warfare and stalemate were prominent, blitzkrieg allowed for swift victories and the advancement of German forces.

For example, during the invasion of Poland in 1939, the German forces used blitzkrieg tactics to quickly conquer Polish territory, bypassing defensive lines and capturing key cities within weeks.

While trench warfare, the bombing of civilians, and the influenza epidemic were all factors during WWII, none of them explain why WWII was NOT a war of attrition or a stalemate like WWI.

Learn more about WWII as a war of attrition or stalemate