Final answer:
The statement is false. Colonial charters divided power between the governor and other bodies such as legislative assemblies. Examples include the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Virginia.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, the statement "In colonial charters, all the power of the government was given to the governor" is false. In colonial charters, power was typically divided between the governor, legislative body, and sometimes the colonists themselves. The governor had significant authority, but not total control over the government.
For example, in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the governor had executive powers but also had to work with the General Court, a representative assembly, which made laws and managed the colony's affairs. This balanced the power between the governor and the legislative body.
Similarly, in Virginia, the governor had authority but was also subject to the decisions made by the House of Burgesses, which was the representative body of the colony. Overall, colonial charters aimed to establish a system of checks and balances rather than concentrating all power in the governor.
Learn more about Power distribution in colonial charters