Question

Decide whether each of the features listed below benefitted Napata or Meroë.

Benefitted
Napata
Feature
closer to Egypt
closer to the Red Sea, which had
many trade routes passing across
it
located near rich sources of iron
received more rainfall
O
O
Benefitted
Meroë
O

Answer 1

Napata and Meroë both had advantages due to their geographical locations. Napata benefitted from its proximity to Egypt and higher rainfall, while Meroë benefitted from being closer to the Red Sea and rich sources of iron.

Step-by-step explanation:

Historical Significance of Napata and Meroë

Napata benefited from its proximity to Egypt as it allowed for cultural exchange, political influence, and military support. Being closer to the Red Sea, Meroë had better access to trade routes and benefited from increased trade activity and prosperity. Additionally, Meroë's location near rich sources of iron provided economic advantages as it allowed for iron production and trade. However, Napata received more rainfall, which benefited agriculture and sustained the kingdom.

In summary, the features that benefited Napata were:

1. Closer proximity to Egypt
2. More rainfall for agriculture

The feature that benefited Meroë was:

1. Proximity to the Red Sea and trade routes
2. Rich sources of iron

Learn more about the benefits of Napata and Meroë