Question

Select the best answer choice.

Regarding assigned case Goldkist v. Brownlee, 355 S.E.2d 773 (Ga. App.
1987):
How is the UCC's 10-day-reply doctrine in issue in this case?
O The doctrine applies if one of the parties is a merchant, which has an effect on the
enforceability of the agreement.
O The doctrine applies if the seller deals in goods of the kind or holds themselves out as
having knowledge or skill peculiar to the subject of the transaction.
O The doctrine applies if and only if both the parties are merchants, which has an effect
on the enforceability of the agreement.
The doctrine applies if the buyer deals in goods of the kind or holds themselves out
as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the subject of the transaction.

Answer 1

The UCC's 10-day-reply doctrine in issue in the case Goldkist v. Brownlee determines the enforceability of the agreement based on the merchant status of the parties involved.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of Goldkist v. Brownlee, the UCC's 10-day-reply doctrine is in issue. The doctrine applies if one of the parties is a merchant, which has an effect on the enforceability of the agreement. In this case, the doctrine is in question as it determines whether the agreement between the parties is enforceable or not based on their status as merchants.

Learn more about UCC's 10-day-reply doctrine in issue in the case Goldkist v. Brownlee