222k views
1 vote
In the context of First Amendment protections of a free press,

O
a)
the federal government has rarely attempted to regulate what can be
published.
b)
the Supreme Court has nonetheless held that there can be some
governmenal restrictions on what can be published.
c)
you can almost always say (or post) whatever you want.
d)
the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could prevent
embarassing stories from being published.
e)
the Federal Communications Commission was found to be an
unconstitutional government agency.

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The First Amendment protections of a free press allow for freedom of speech, but there are limitations and government restrictions on what can be published.


Step-by-step explanation:

In the context of First Amendment protections of a free press, the federal government has rarely attempted to regulate what can be published. However, the Supreme Court has held that there can be some governmental restrictions on what can be published. This means that while you have a lot of freedom to say or post whatever you want, there are limitations when it comes to certain forms of speech, such as defamation, invasion of privacy, obscenity, incitement to violence, and national security concerns.


Learn more about First Amendment protections of a free press

User Soundlink
by
7.1k points