Final answer:
The landmark Supreme Court decision in California v. Ciraolo allowed law enforcement to conduct warrantless aerial observation of private property.
Step-by-step explanation:
The landmark Supreme Court decision in California v Hailee:
The correct name of the case is California v. Ciraolo, not California v. Hailee. In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment did not prevent the warrantless aerial observation of a person's property from the navigable airspace. This means that law enforcement can use aerial surveillance, such as helicopters or drones, to observe private property without a warrant.
An example of this ruling in action is when law enforcement uses a helicopter to fly over a suspect's property to gather evidence of illegal activity without obtaining a search warrant.
Learn more about Supreme Court decision in California v. Ciraolo