Question

2. Traditionally, Natural Rights Theory (Natural Law Theory) has been invoked to appeal to the notion of intrinsic and

inalienable human rights and due dignity. But this has been built off of a teleological understanding of nature.
Contemporary dialogue often redefines nature, however, in order to assert fluid (changing) psychological identities that
run contrary to biological nature. But, if there is no teleological design to sex or marriage, and if we are free to define
"personhood" in the same way that we might define gender, then why suppose that human rights really exist? Why not
suppose that we have only defined them according to our own purposes-to impose our own values upon the rest of
nature? Is the claim that I am whatever gender I believe myself to be any different from the claim that I have inalienable
rights because I believe myself to have them? Is an assertion of natural rights the same as an assertion of gender
identity? Is one more justifiable than the other? Is one more problematic than the other? Why ought anyone else accept
and respect someone's claim to either of these facts"? Explain

Answer 1

Natural Rights Theory and the contemporary dialogue on nature and identity challenge traditional understandings of human rights and gender identity. Both claims can be equally justifiable or problematic. Acceptance and respect should be based on empathy, understanding, and acknowledging human diversity.

Step-by-step explanation:

Natural Rights Theory, also known as Natural Law Theory, is based on the idea that humans have inherent and inalienable rights and dignity. However, the contemporary dialogue on nature and identity challenges traditional understandings. When it comes to the notion of human rights, if there is no teleological design to sex or marriage and if we are free to define personhood and gender, then one could argue that human rights are subjective and based on personal values. This is similar to the idea that one's gender identity is based on personal belief and self-perception. Both claims can be equally justifiable or problematic depending on the perspectives of individuals. Ultimately, acceptance and respect for someone's claim regarding their gender identity or rights should be based on empathy, understanding, and acknowledging the diversity of human experiences.

Learn more about Natural Rights Theory and Gender Identity