Final answer:
The U.S. Supreme Court usually relies on a teleological approach when deciding cases, considering the purpose and impact of laws in relation to broader societal goals.
Step-by-step explanation:
The U.S. Supreme Court usually relies on a teleological approach when deciding cases. This means that the Court focuses on the end or purpose of a law, rather than just interpreting the literal language. The teleological approach considers the intended impact or outcome of the law and how it aligns with the overall goals of society.
For example, if the Court is interpreting a constitutional provision, they may consider the original intent of the framers and the underlying principles that guide the Constitution. By taking a teleological approach, the Court can ensure that their decisions promote the broader goals of justice, fairness, and the well-being of society.
In contrast, the options of hedonistic, deontological, and common sense are not typically used as approaches by the U.S. Supreme Court when deciding cases. Hedonism focuses on seeking pleasure and avoiding pain, which is not a primary consideration in legal interpretation. Deontological ethics emphasizes rules and duties, but the Court's approach goes beyond a strict rule-based analysis. Common sense is a broad term that can vary depending on individual perspectives and may not be a reliable basis for legal decisions.
Learn more about U.S. Supreme Court approach to deciding cases