Question

Part II:

Content analysis: Research and analyze any of the two researches that evaluates the comprehensive agrarian reform program.. Identify and explain specific issues against the program and formulate your own recommendations. a. The comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program after 30 years:

Accomplishments and Program Options by Ballesteros, Ancheta and Ramos https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidsdps1734.pdf)

(2017)

(

b. Agrarian Reform and Rural Development in a Post-CARPER Scenario:from the Prospective of Civil Society (ANGOC, CARRD, JJCICSI, KAISAHAN, AR, Now!,

2015)

Answer 1

The subject of this question is Social Studies at the college level. The question asks the student to research and analyze two studies that evaluate the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in the Philippines. The student is also required to identify and explain specific issues against the program and formulate their own recommendations.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of the question is Social Studies at the college level. The question asks the student to research and analyze two studies that evaluate the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in the Philippines. The two studies mentioned are:

a. 'The comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program after 30 years: Accomplishments and Program Options' by Ballesteros, Ancheta, and Ramos (2017)

b. 'Agrarian Reform and Rural Development in a Post-CARPER Scenario: from the Prospective of Civil Society' by ANGOC, CARRD, JJCICSI, KAISAHAN, AR, Now! (2015)

The student is also asked to identify and explain specific issues against the program and formulate their own recommendations.

Learn more about Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in the Philippines

Answer 2

The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program has faced issues such as ineffectiveness, inequity, and lack of sustainability. Research points to the need for enhanced support services, addressing legal challenges, and a targeted approach for improvement.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), which has been in effect for over three decades, aimed to distribute land and provide support services to beneficiaries. However, various issues against the program have been identified, particularly concerning effectiveness, equity, and the sustainability of its outcome.

One of the key issues raised in the research by Ballesteros, Ancheta, and Ramos (2017) is the mixed results of the program in terms of productivity and income among beneficiaries. Another concern is the uneven implementation across regions that resulted in inequity of land distribution. Furthermore, issues related to land transfer mechanisms and support services have hindered the progress of agrarian reform.

Building upon these findings, my recommendation would be to focus on the strengthening of post-distribution support services to maximize farmers' productivity and livelihood opportunities. It is also vital to address the legal and bureaucratic challenges that slow down land distribution and to implement a more targeted approach that considers the specific needs of various regions and sectors within agrarian communities.