Question

L 1.4.2 Test (CST): Introduction to U.S.

Question 7 of 20
Read this claim:
overnment
The United States would be better served in times of war if
we had a policy of required national service.
Which statement about the claim is true?
OA. It is neither arguable nor defensible.
OB. It is defensible but not arguable.
OC. It is both arguable and defensible.
OD. It is arguable but not defensible.
SUBMIT

Answer 1

The claim that the United States would be better served in times of war if there was a policy of required national service is both arguable and defensible.

Step-by-step explanation:

The claim stated is that the United States would be better served in times of war if there was a policy of required national service. The statement about the claim is that it is both arguable and defensible.

The claim here is arguable because there are differing opinions on whether mandatory national service would actually be beneficial during times of war. Some might argue that it would help to ensure a sufficient number of troops, while others might argue that it would infringe on individual freedoms.

At the same time, the claim is defensible because there are valid arguments that can be made in support of it. For example, it could be argued that mandatory national service would instill a sense of patriotism and civic duty among citizens, and could also provide valuable skills and training to those who serve.

Learn more about mandatory national service