Question

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in

Dred Scotty Sandford written by Justice Taney
The question before us is, whether the class of
persons described in the plea in abatement compose
a portion of this people, and are constituent
members of this sovereignty? We think they are not
and that they are not included, and were not
intended to be included, under the word "citizens in
the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the
rights and privileges which that instrument provides
for and secures to citizens of the United States On
the contrary, they were at that time considered as a
subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had
What fallacy can you identity and discredit to
develop a counterclaim to this claim?
the idea that citizens have nights and privileges
that are guaranteed in the Constitution
the idea that noncitizens cannot claim certain
rights and privileges in the Constitution
the idea that the plaintiff considers himself a
citizen and therefore has nights and privileges
the idea that African American people are inferior
based on perceptions from an earlier time

Answer 1

The claim that citizens have rights and privileges guaranteed in the Constitution can be discredited by the fact that noncitizens can still claim certain rights and privileges in the Constitution. The passage also reflects the fallacy that African American people are inferior based on perceptions from an earlier time.

Step-by-step explanation:

The claim in the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, stating that citizens have rights and privileges guaranteed in the Constitution, is based on the idea that certain rights and privileges are exclusive to citizens of the United States. However, this claim can be discredited by the fact that noncitizens can still claim certain rights and privileges in the Constitution. For example, the Fourteenth Amendment grants equal protection under the law to all persons, regardless of citizenship. Therefore, the idea that noncitizens cannot claim certain rights and privileges in the Constitution is a fallacy.

Furthermore, the passage also reflects the fallacy that African American people are inferior based on perceptions from an earlier time. This fallacy has been discredited by the Civil Rights Movement and the subsequent legal protections and societal changes that have recognized the equality and human rights of African Americans.

Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford