Final answer:
During the Progressive era, the attempts to limit the hours of all workers involved different laws and actions. The Supreme Court did not severely limit states' reforms, the Underwood Act did not end child labor for those under 14, and not every state had limited or banned child labor and passed compulsory educational laws by 1918.
Step-by-step explanation:
A false statement about the attempts to limit the hours of all workers during the Progressive era is that the Supreme Court severely limited states' reforms by overturning a New York law for a ten-hour limit for males as an illegprotect the health of its citizens.
In reality, the Supreme Court did not overturn a New York law specifically for a ten-hour limit for males. The Court actually upheld state regulations aimed at protecting the health and well-being of workers.
Furthermore, the Underwood Act, also known as the Federal Child Labor Law, was not passed to end child labor for those under 14. Instead, it focused on regulating and prohibiting certain types of employment for children under the age of 16.
By 1918, while many states had implemented laws to limit or ban child labor, not every state had done so. It was a gradual process, and some states had not yet passed compulsory educational laws.
Learn more about Attempts to limit the hours of all workers during the Progressive era