Final answer:
The federal government didn't help in Shays' Rebellion due to its lack of authority and means under the Articles of Confederation. Some members of the government even saw it as an opportunity to advocate for a stronger central government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The federal government did not help the situation in Massachusetts during Shays' Rebellion because it did not have the authority or means to intervene directly in state affairs. At the time, the government was operating under the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government with limited powers. The federal government lacked the power to raise an army or provide financial assistance to states in crisis.
Additionally, some members of the federal government, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed that the rebellion was a necessary reminder of the importance of a strong central government. They saw Shays' Rebellion as evidence of the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation and argued that it highlighted the need for a stronger federal government, eventually leading to the creation of the United States Constitution and a stronger central government.
Ultimately, it was up to the state government of Massachusetts to handle the situation and suppress the rebellion. They did so by raising a state militia and taking measures to restore order.
Learn more about Shays' Rebellion