Question

Chief Justice Taney specifically mentioned the Constitution as the reason for his majority opinion in the Dred Scott Case. What part of the Constitution was Chief Justice Taney referring to when he made his decision? 1) comp of 1820 and comp of 1850 2) comp of 1850 and Kansas-Nebraska Act 3) Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and Missouri Comp of 1850 4) Missouri Comp of 1820 and Northwest Ordinance of 1787 5) all of these pieces of legislation were ruled unconstitutional by Chief Justice Roger Taney

Answer 1

Chief Justice Taney was referring to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787.

Step-by-step explanation:

Chief Justice Taney was specifically referring to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 when he made his decision in the Dred Scott Case.

In the case, Dred Scott, an enslaved person, claimed his time living in free territories made him free. The Supreme Court declared that the relevant parts of the Missouri Compromise were unconstitutional, ruling that Scott remained enslaved. This decision also had implications for the Northwest Ordinance, which had prohibited slavery in certain territories.

Learn more about Dred Scott Case