Final answer:
The fairness of the Constitution of 1791 is subjective and depends on one's perspective. While it provided a framework for a strong government and protected individual liberties, it did not extend these protections to all individuals.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks whether the Constitution of 1791 was fair to all. The answer to this question is subjective and depends on one's perspective. While some may argue that the Constitution of 1791 was fair to all because it provided a framework for a strong government and protected individual liberties through amendments such as the Bill of Rights, others may argue that it was not fair because it did not extend these protections to all individuals, such as enslaved people and women.
For example, the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution in 1791, guarantees certain rights and freedoms to individuals, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. These protections were seen as an important step towards safeguarding individual liberties.
However, it is important to note that the Constitution also had its shortcomings. For instance, it did not grant the same rights and protections to all individuals. Enslaved people were not considered citizens and did not enjoy the same rights and freedoms as others. Women were also excluded from many political and legal rights.
Learn more about Constitution of 1791