16.2k views
0 votes
Argue against the elimination of speed limits

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Speed limits are essential for safety, efficiency, and environmental sustainability on roads.


Step-by-step explanation:

Arguments Against the Elimination of Speed Limits

There are several compelling reasons to argue against the elimination of speed limits:

  1. Safety: Speed limits are put in place to ensure the safety of drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. Without speed limits, there would be an increased risk of accidents and fatalities on the roads. Speed limits help to regulate and control the flow of traffic, decreasing the likelihood of collisions.
  2. Efficiency: Speed limits also contribute to the efficiency of transportation systems. By setting a maximum speed, traffic can flow more smoothly, reducing congestion and travel times. Without speed limits, there would be chaos on the roads, making it more difficult for people to commute, deliver goods, and access emergency services.
  3. Environmental Impact: High speeds lead to increased fuel consumption and emissions, contributing to air pollution and climate change. Speed limits help to moderate and reduce these negative environmental impacts. Removing speed limits would undermine efforts to promote sustainable transportation and combat global warming.

In conclusion, the elimination of speed limits would compromise safety, efficiency, and environmental sustainability. Speed limits serve as an important regulatory measure to ensure the smooth and orderly functioning of transportation systems.


Learn more about Arguments against the elimination of speed limits

User Pantelis Sopasakis
by
7.8k points