Question

Which piece of evidence best illustrates why the 5Pointz

trial is considered a "landmark trial"?
O A. "A federal judge in Brooklyn awarded a judgment of
$6.7 million on Monday to 21 graffiti artists whose works
were destroyed in 2013 at the 5Pointz complex in Long
Island City, Queens." (Paragraph 1)
OB. "Judge Block upheld the jury's decision, and his ruling
awarded the artists the maximum damages possible, saying
that 45 of the dozens of ruined murals had enough artistic
stature to merit being protected." (Paragraph 4)
O C. "Judge Block's ruling - and the size of the judgment
he awarded - was a decisive victory for the [art world]."
(Paragraph 5)
O D. "But the 5Pointz case, he said, was the first time that
graffiti and graffiti artists were protected under V.A.R.A."
(Paragraph 6)

Answer 1

Option B provides evidence that the 5Pointz trial is considered a 'landmark trial' because it demonstrates the court's decision to protect the artistic value of graffiti.

Step-by-step explanation:

The piece of evidence that best illustrates why the 5Pointz trial is considered a 'landmark trial' is option B: 'Judge Block upheld the jury's decision, and his ruling awarded the artists the maximum damages possible, saying that 45 of the dozens of ruined murals had enough artistic stature to merit being protected.' This evidence demonstrates that the court made a significant decision to protect the artistic value of the graffiti, setting a precedent for future cases involving graffiti artists. The ruling recognized graffiti as an art form deserving of legal protection.

Learn more about The significance of the 5Pointz trial in recognizing graffiti as an art form