Final answer:
Providing statistical data on fire-resistant construction efficacy, historical examples of how past building improvements have made a positive impact, and expert reasoning about fire-containment design features are ways to strengthen the argument for improvements to buildings and towns for fire containment.
Step-by-step explanation:
To strengthen the argument that improvements can be made to buildings and towns to help contain fires, one could provide evidence that encompasses historical examples, statistical data, and expert reasoning. An effective piece of evidence might include statistics that showcase the efficacy of fire-resistant construction, like less damage after a fire or fewer fatalities. A historical example such as the shift from wooden to brick and steel structures following tragic fires in the past would highlight how building improvements can lead to positive outcomes. Additionally, reasoning from fire safety experts or engineers explaining how certain design features can contain fires would serve as logical and practical evidence.
For instance, referring to the introduction of firebreaks and their success in containing fires, or mentioning the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions due to stricter building standards could provide the needed evidence. Exemplification of these measures with clear results, such as a decrease in urban fires or an improved response by fire services because of better infrastructure, would demonstrate the potential for such improvements.