Final answer:
If you operate a shipping and packaging service expanding to multiple states, you may be subject to regulation by both state and federal governments. The Motor Carrier Act of 1980 outlines this. Wickard v. Filburn is an example of a Marshall Court case that justifies the federal government's power to create agencies during the Great Depression. The Marbury decision enhanced checks and balances through the establishment of judicial review.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you operated a shipping and packaging service within New York City and expanded to include shipments and deliveries between New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, you could be subject to regulation by both the states and the federal government. This is because shipping and transportation regulations fall under both state and federal jurisdiction. The court case that outlines this is the Motor Carrier Act of 1980, which regulated interstate transportation and eliminated state economic regulations on trucking.
During the Great Depression, the federal government established many new government agencies to stimulate growth in the economy. The Marshall Court case that would serve as an example for why the federal government had the power to create these agencies is Wickard v. Filburn (1942). In this case, the Court upheld the federal government's power to regulate intrastate economic activity if it had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
The Marbury decision enhanced the system of checks and balances outlined in the Constitution by establishing the power of judicial review. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to declare laws or actions by the executive or legislative branches as unconstitutional. This ensures that the actions of the other branches of government adhere to the Constitution and prevents abuse of power.
Learn more about Shipping regulations, federal government power, Marbury decision