Final answer:
The statements from Thoreau's essay that emphasize the individual's value over society or government are his assertion that justice cannot be solely determined by the majority, and his rhetorical questions about the role of individual conscience versus legislative power.
Step-by-step explanation:
To identify the parts of the excerpt from Henry David Thoreau's essay "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience" that emphasize the common romantic theme that the individual has greater value than society or government, we look for statements reflecting Thoreau's valuation of personal conscience and individual action over the collective will of society or the dictates of government.
One such statement is "But a government in which the majority rules in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand it." This underlines the idea that justice is not always served by the will of the majority, indicating a deeper value in the individual sense of justice over societal determination.
Another key statement is "Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward." Here, Thoreau argues that personal conscience should not be subordinate to laws or legislators, reinforcing the romantic theme that individual morals and beliefs are more important than the mechanisms of society or government. These parts of the text highlight the sentiment that individual freedom and moral autonomy outweigh any societal or governmental demands or expectations.